ºÚÁÏÍø¹ÙÍø

Faced with the rising concern regarding teen drug and substance abuse, the Supreme Court granted public schools the legal permission to administer random drug tests for student-athletes in 2002. Since this decision, public schools have contemplated expanding the drug testing scope into their entire student population.

According to , in the 2005 to 2006 academic year alone, 373 public schools received federal funds for drug testing, which was quite a surge in response compared to the mere 79 public schools just two years prior.

With the rising implementation of drug tests for student-athletes, advocates for drug testing assert that schools should now expand their screening. As the legal barriers that oppose public school drug tests have been overturned, more schools are contemplating the opportunity to expand their drug testing parameters. This shift in policy has some parents, students, and academic leaders concerned about student rights. Can public schools randomly screen their students for drugs without invading a student’s privacy rights?

Drug Testing in ºÚÁÏÍø¹ÙÍø Schools

While the number of schools randomly testing student-athletes for drug use is rising, the total number of participating public schools only amounts to a rather tiny percentage, with just 28,000 public schools screening students for drugs. Many public schools, as USA Today further reveals, have been reluctant to pursue drug testing policies and actions out of a fear of violating state-mandated rights and laws.

In contrast, advocates for drug testing assert that students can be tested without being unreasonably

The debate on whether smaller class size corresponds with higher academic achievement is an ongoing controversy. Numerous studies have been conducted with conflicting results. Federal funding for class size reduction has been inconsistent. A 1999 federal program designed specifically to fund class size reduction was repealed by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. The inconclusive results from the studies of class size reduction leave education policymakers to decide whether reducing class sizes should be a state priority in school reform. This article discusses some of the approaches states have used to regulate class size, whether current budget shortages or other changing conditions may have an unintended impact on class size initiatives, and what parents can do with respect to their child's class sizes.

This insightful article delves into states' various approaches to regulating class size, examining their effectiveness and potential unintended consequences amidst current budget shortages and changing educational landscapes. We explore how factors such as funding limitations, shifting priorities, and evolving instructional models may impact class size initiatives. Additionally, we provide valuable guidance for parents on understanding and advocating for their child's class sizes. By empowering parents with knowledge and practical steps, we aim to equip them to engage with schools, educators, and policymakers to ensure optimal learning environments for their children. Discover the complexities of class size regulations, their potential implications, and how parents can actively contribute to the conversation surrounding this critical aspect of education.

State Laws Limiting Class Size

Notwithstanding the ongoing

Common sense suggests that public school children will do better in smaller classes than in larger classes. Smaller class sizes provide the opportunity for personal attention and additional instructional help when necessary. Yet, whether smaller class sizes boost academic achievement has been examined in numerous studies with mixed results. This article examines how class size affects academic performance, where smaller class sizes can have the greatest impact, and how some critics question the benefits and cost-effectiveness of class size reduction.

Advantages of Reducing Class Size

Several studies have shown that reducing class size increases overall student achievement, especially for younger, disadvantaged children. The following are some of the benefits of fewer students in a classroom.

1. Students receive more individualized attention and interact more with the teacher.
2. Teachers have more flexibility to use different instructional approaches.
3. Fewer students are less distracting to each other than a large group of children.
4. Teachers have more time to teach because there are fewer discipline problems.
5. Students are more likely to participate in class and become more involved.
6. Teachers have more time to cover additional material and use more supplementary texts and enrichment activities.

As a practical matter, it is not possible for most public schools to hire enough teachers so that all classes in grades kindergarten through 12^th grade have no more than, for example, 18 students. Given finite resources to hire new teachers, judgments have to be made about where the additional teachers should be placed.

This TEDxTalk presents a student's perspective on small class sizes.